Have You Been Harmed By One Of The Drugs Or Other Medical Products Covered On This Site?

If so, you may have a possible legal case against the manufacturer of the potentially dangerous drug or medical product. Simply fill out the short form below and an experienced legal expert will contact you as soon as possible!

First Name:

Last Name:

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Daytime Phone Number:

Alternate Phone Number (Optional):

E-Mail Address:



Is this request for you or someone else?
Myself
My Spouse or
Minor Child
Other Relative or Friend

Drug Or Device Exposed To:


Dates Taken:


Related Health Problems Caused By The Drug:


Smoking Couple Face Eviction

Added August 1st, 2005

In an unprecedented case, a Boston housing Jury has ruled that a couple could be evicted from their rented home for heavy smoking, despite the fact that that their lease allowed them to smoke in the property. Erin Carey and Ted Baar had been smoking heavily in the apartment, and neighbors began to complain about the smell of smoke seeping through the walls and affecting their properties. Further to these complaints, the landlord of the properties on Sleeper Street ordered the couple to leave the apartment.

The apartment in which Carey and Baar live is just a one bedroom property, and the couple run an I.T. sales business from the property, which means that they are in the apartment for the majority of the day. Each of the couple smokes about one pack of cigarettes each day, which equates to around forty cigarettes being smoked in the property each day. However, the couple have claimed that it is not the level of smoking that has affected the other properties but the poor construction and ventilation of the building.

The couple were ordered out of the property in November 2004, and earlier this month the jury ruled in the landlord’s favor. It is thought to be the first case where heavy smoking has been considered a nuisance in terms of a legal contract and has resulted in eviction.

Richard Daynard, chairman of Northeastern University's Tobacco Products Liability Project, stated: "It is very important, because it is a sign that people are more aware of how dangerous second-hand smoke is. I believe this decision could accelerate the willingness of courts to decide that, if you are creating smoke that is seeping into other people's units, you are doing something that has to stop."

Smoking Couple Face... | Printable Version (Opens In New Window)


Important Notice: RYAR.org is a legal informational site.The content contained herein was not prepared by lawyers and should not be taken as a substitute for legal advice from a licensed attorney. Additionally, this information is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship simply by its viewing. The creation of an attorney-client relationship requires more than viewing this or affiliated websites. Neither the transmission nor receipt of this website material will create an attorney-client relationship between sender and receiver. The material contained herein is general in nature and may or may not be applicable to a viewer’s individual legal needs. Online readers should not act on this information without seeking professional counsel. Please read our 'Terms & Conditions Of Use' for more information.

Additionally, the information contained on RYAR.org, including but not limited to informational articles, other text/images, and on or off site links, has not been prepared, endorsed, or reviewed by any form of licensed medical professional, including but not limited to physicians, doctors, and so on. Nothing on the this website should be taken as medical advice, but instead should act as a useful resource in providing general information that may be useful to members of the general public. All visitors are encouraged to consult with a physician or other licensed medical professional for any form of medical advice. Please see our 'Terms & Conditions Of Use' for further information