---------
The recent controversy surrounding cox-2 inhibitor drugs such as Vioxx and Bextra has already resulted in a number of lawsuits and compensation claims being filed against the manufacturers of the drugs, and this because of serious side effects that can be suffered by patients taking these medications. Bextra is a cox-2 inhibitor, used to treat osteoarthritis, menstrual cramps, and other adult pain. The drug, manufactured by pharmaceutical giant Pfizer, was approved by the FDA in November 2001, despite reports of serious skin problems in some people that had already taken the drug.
Another major cox-2 inhibitor, Vioxx, was taken off the market in September 2004 following indications that the drug was linked to a dramatic increase in heart attacks and strokes in longer term users. Although Bextra has not yet been conclusively linked to the same problems, testing is to be carried out to check any possible links due to the similarities between Bextra and the recalled drug, Vioxx. And, although Bextra has not yet been linked with heart attacks and strokes, this drugs comes with some serious and deadly side effects of its own – Stevens-Johnson Syndrome, and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis, both of which are potentially deadly skin diseases.
The side effects related to Bextra have already resulted in a number of Bextra lawsuit filed against the drug’s manufacturer, Pfizer. The number of Bextra lawsuits is expected to increase as more evidence of the dangers of this drug comes to light, and particularly if it is found to be linked to heart trouble and strokes. Those that have suffered other side effects from taking Bextra are also filing claims against the manufacturer, which is only just getting around to placing a black box label on the packaging of Bextra.
The latest Bextra lawsuit to hit Pfizer was filed very recently in mid-November 2004, and this related to the death of a man that had been taking the drug for nine months. The Bextra lawsuit claims that the drug was directly responsible for the death of the New Jersey man, who was aged just 46. Other Bextra lawsuits have already been filed against Pfizer, and many more are expected following the rising concerns over this drug.
The rise in Bextra lawsuits, as well as other drug-related lawsuits, has seen an increase in the number of lawyers specializing in drug litigation. These lawyers are fully trained in the legalities and implications surrounding this type of drug litigation, and therefore can increase the chances of a successful Bextra lawsuit. Specialist lawyers can also offer free initial consultations, enabling those that have suffered to see whether they have grounds to file a Bextra lawsuit.
Anyone that has suffered the side effects of Bextra is advised to look into filing a Bextra lawsuit with a view to claiming compensation for pain, suffering, and any medical costs that may have been incurred due to the ill effects of taking Bextra. It is best to discuss the possibility of a Bextra lawsuit with a qualified and experienced drugs litigation lawyer, as this can make the difference between a successful or an unsuccessful claim.
A drugs litigation lawyer can offer advice on whether you have enough of a case to file a Bextra lawsuit, and can offer advice on the most appropriate course of action to maximise your chances of a successful Bextra lawsuit. Even if you are unsure as to whether you are eligible to file a Bextra lawsuit, you should contact an experienced lawyer who can advise you further with regards to this.
If so, you may have a possible legal case against the manufacturer of the potentially dangerous drug or medical product. Simply fill out the short form below and an experienced legal expert will contact you as soon as possible!
